Related Blogs

Mon, Mar 10th at 5:25 pm
Planning ahead? We recently looked up a slew of annually occuring events to help out a colleague,...
Thu, Feb 20th at 12:15 pm
Dear Don't Move Firewood, My family and I are coming up in June to camp at the Jellystone Park...
Tue, Feb 18th at 1:14 pm
Here are Don't Move Firewood, we are gearing up for the annual spring rush of website traffic...
Thu, Feb 6th at 5:48 pm
Have you ever tried to look up your state's firewood regulations on our map and thought to...
06/24/2013 1:32 PM
Posted by: L. Greenwood
loading...

Dear Don't Move Firewood,

I live in Missouri and I camp often. Is it ok to use lumber without bark?

Yours,

Concerned Camper

 

Dear Concerned Camper,

What a deceptively complicated question- and a good one to ask. Lumber (I assume you mean cut firewood, not construction lumber here) without bark is indeed a bit less likely to contain bark dwelling insects, or insects that burrow between the bark and the heartwood (like emerald ash borer). But it is NOT safe 100%, and thus it often violates state or federal quarantines regardless of what part of the tree that an insect might prefer. Firewood without bark is not OK to transport from a practical, and often legal, perspective.

 

I found this nice brochure on the specifics of emerald ash borer in Missouri. From there, you can learn about one pest in Missouri- but there are others, like thousand cankers disease, that also spread on firewood (and in the heartwood, so de-barking doesn't help at all) and are also a big threat.

 

Verdict? Not a good idea. Please either keep firewood local, or buy it near your destination. Thanks for asking.

 

Sign up to receive one of our newsletters

Monthly updates on firewood outreach, regulation, and industry
Quarterly updates on firewood and forest issues of general interest
Help