Related Blogs

Wed, Mar 25th at 1:46 pm
Dear Don't Move Firewood- I'm getting ready for a big roadtrip- heading to Yellowstone, the...
Fri, Mar 13th at 3:02 pm
Dear Don't Move Firewood- I understand firewood cannot be transported over 50 miles in New York...
Thu, Dec 4th at 11:38 am
Dear Don't Move Firewood, You say that we shouldn't move firewood, but don't Christmas...
Tue, Oct 28th at 11:46 am
Dear Don't Move Firewood, If we go camping in a National Park out of state and buy firewood...
06/24/2013 12:32 PM
Posted by: L. Greenwood
loading...

Dear Don't Move Firewood,

I live in Missouri and I camp often. Is it ok to use lumber without bark?

Yours,

Concerned Camper

 

Dear Concerned Camper,

What a deceptively complicated question- and a good one to ask. Lumber (I assume you mean cut firewood, not construction lumber here) without bark is indeed a bit less likely to contain bark dwelling insects, or insects that burrow between the bark and the heartwood (like emerald ash borer). But it is NOT safe 100%, and thus it often violates state or federal quarantines regardless of what part of the tree that an insect might prefer. Firewood without bark is not OK to transport from a practical, and often legal, perspective.

 

I found this nice brochure on the specifics of emerald ash borer in Missouri. From there, you can learn about one pest in Missouri- but there are others, like thousand cankers disease, that also spread on firewood (and in the heartwood, so de-barking doesn't help at all) and are also a big threat.

 

Verdict? Not a good idea. Please either keep firewood local, or buy it near your destination. Thanks for asking.

 

Sign up to receive our newsletter

Monthly updates on firewood outreach, regulation, and industry
Quarterly updates on firewood and forest issues of general interest
Help
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.